CYCLE 1 / EPISODE 1

Subscribe on your favorite platform

Guests

Gabriele Pasqui

Gabriele Pasqui is a full Professor of Urban Policies and Planning at Politecnico di Milano. With degrees in socio-economic disciplines and theoretical philosophy, as well as a PhD in Urban Policies from IUAV University of Venice, Gabriele brings a multidisciplinary perspective to understanding urban environments. His key research interests include interpreting the dynamics of contemporary cities, exploring urban policies, and examining urban governance and strategic planning. Thanks to his diverse academic background, Gabriele is able to observe urban spaces through less conventional and more flexible tools, drawing from his background in philosophy. This perspective challenges the more tangible methods often favoured by planners and urban scholars. 
In this episode, Gabriele’s insights provide a rich backdrop for understanding where the field of urban studies stands today and, by extension, where we, as urban scholars, should position ourselves. His contributions set the stage for the discussion between Dafni and Giulia, serving as both context and inspiration.

Barbara Piga 

Barbara Piga is an Associate Professor at Politecnico di Milano and the Coordinator of the Laboratorio di Simulazione Urbana Fausto Curti – Labsmiurb since its foundation in 2007. At labsimurb she coordinates and leads research projects related to experiential simulation and sensory urban design. She is founding partner of the REAACH – Representation Advances and Challenges Association since its foundation in 2022. She is also member of the Board of the interdepartmental research laboratory i.Drive – Interaction Between Driver, Road Infrastructure, Vehicle, And Environment since 2019, where she is responsible for mobility experiential simulation and the urban/landscape environment guidelines (assessment and design perspective). She is member of the Scientific Committee of the POLIMI laborA laboratory (since 2022), which develops simulations in both Virtual Reality, physical, and holographic modeling.  

Gloria Calderone 

Gloria Calderone is an architect by training with a PhD from the University of Florence. Gloria’s research delves into the fascinating intersection of performing arts, public spaces, and urban life, exploring how bodily experiences influence people’s perceptions of public spaces—the meanings and values they attribute to them.  Her research employs qualitative methods and participant observation, providing deep insights into these dynamics. Currently, Gloria is a research fellow at the University of Palermo, where she is conducting studies on inner areas and their unique challenges. We first met Gloria at the AESOP Young Academics Conference 2024, where she presented her work on bodily and synaesthetic experiences in urban spaces. Her presentation struck us as highly relevant, and we invited her to join this episode because of her expertise and sensitivity to the role of the body offer a critical perspective for understanding our positionality as observers of urban spaces.

Lizzy Privitera  

Elisa (Lizzy) Privitera is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Toronto. Lizzy holds a degree in architecture from the University of Catania, where she also earned her PhD in Community Environmental Planning. Lizzy is actively involved in the Listening Project—a community-based initiative that collaborates with local partners to envision and work toward equitable transitions. Her research focuses on how the co-production of knowledge can drive environmental and social urban justice.  This project serves as the centrepiece of today’s interview. In other interview,  we touched on topics like emotions, bodily experiences, and subjective observations of space, but we didn’t dive into practical methods. With Lizzy, we aim to explore how these approaches can be applied in practice, using her experience in the Listening Project as a guide. Specifically, we’ll focus on one of the project’s core tools: walking methods, and how they enable deeper engagement with urban spaces.

Resources

Suggested readings  

Armiero, M., Andritsos, T., Barca, S., Bràs, R., Cayuela, S. R., Dedeoğlu, Ç., Pierri, M. D., De Oliveira Fernandesisa, L., Gravagno, F., Greco, L., Greyl, L., Iengo, I., Lindblom, J., Milanez, F., Pedro, S., Pappalardo, G., Petrillo, A., Portaluri, M., Privitera, E., Sari, A. C., & Velegrakis, G. (2019). Toxic Bios: Toxic Autobiographies – A Public Environmental Humanities Project. Environmental Justice, 00(00), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2018.0019 

Britto, F. D., & Jacques, P. B. (2009). Bodycity: art as urban micro-resistance. Fractal Revista de Psicologia, 21(n. 2), 337–350. 

Calderone, G. (2024). Corprogettazioni. Posture performative per coreografare la città. Gli Ori. 

Calderone, G., & Mandalari, V. (2024). Performing spatial atmospheres to awaken places: the case of the project Sulla Soglia in Palermo. In M. Boubezari, C. R. Duarte, & E. Pinheiro (Eds.), Sensory Explorations, Ambiances in a Changing World: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Ambiances. International Ambiances Network. Lisbon, Portugal. 

Careri, C. (2017 [2002]). Walkscapes: Walking as an Aesthetic Practice. Ames, IA: Culicidae Architectural Press. 

Chadwick, R. (2017). Embodied methodologies: Challenges, reflections and strategies. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 54–74. 

Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as a Method. In Paper Knowledge. Toward a Media History of Documents. Routledge. 

Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 

Corburn, J. (2005). Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Cranz, G. (2016). Ethnography for designers. In Ethnography for Designers. Routledge. 

de Certeau, M. (1980). L’invention du quotidien. Union générale d’éditions. 

Decandia, L. (2000). Dell’identità. Saggio sui luoghi per una critica della razionalità urbanistica. Soverio Manelli: Rubettino. 

Edensor, T., & Bowdler, C. (2015). Site-specific dance: Revealing and contesting the ludic qualities, everyday rhythms, and embodied habits of place. Environment and Planning A, 47(3), 709–726. 

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Situated knowledge: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 183–201). London: Free Association Books. 

Harding, S. (1995). Strong objectivity: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104, 331–349. 

Mallgrave, H. F. (2013). Architecture and Embodiment. The Implications of the New Sciences and Humanities for Design. Routledge. 

Micarelli, R., & Pizziolo, G. (2003). Dai margini del caos: L’ecologia del progettare. Florence, Italy: Alinea. 

Micarelli, R., & Pizziolo, G. (2003). L’arte delle relazioni. Florence, Italy: Alinea. 

O’ Neill, M., & Roberts, B. (2020). Walking methods: Research on the move. Routledge. 

Privitera, E. (2024). (Counter)mapping toxic legacies: A small, slow, and street approach in the risk landscapes of Gela. Officina, 47, 40–49. https://www.officinajournal.it/officina/index.php/journal/article/view/47_4 

Privitera, E., & Gravagno, F. (2020). A street-explorative and interactive-designing laboratory: Notes from an experience of creating a deutero-laboratory and applying deutero-learning in the Sicilian neighborhood of San Berillo (Catania, Italy). The Urban Transcripts Journal, Special Issue “The Space of the (Re)Public,” 3(1). https://journal.urbantranscripts.org/article/a-street-explorative-and-interactive-designing-laboratory-elisa-privitera-and-filippo-gravagno/ 

Privitera, E., Armiero, M., & Gravagno, F. (2021). Seeking justice in risk landscapes: Small data and toxic autobiographies from an Italian petrochemical town (Gela, Sicily). Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 26(7), 847–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1922999 

Sandercock, L. (2003a). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. London, UK: Continuum. 

Sandercock, L. (2003b). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209 

Sclavi, M. (2003). L’arte di ascoltare e mondi possibili. Milan: Bruno Mondadori. 

Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). Walking Methodologies in a More-than-Human World: WalkingLab. Routledge. 

Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. 

Stengers, I. (2018). Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 

Sweet, E. L., & Ortiz Escalante, S. (2015). Bringing bodies into planning: Visceral methods, fear and gender violence. Urban Studies, 52(10), 1826–1845. 

Sweet, E. L., Sanders, R., & Peters, D. M. (2021). Reversing the gaze, insiders out, outsiders in: Stories from the ivory tower and the field. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(7), 1028–1041. 

Whybrow, N. (Ed.). (2021). Urban Sensographies. Routledge. 

Zardini, M. (2005). Toward a Sensorial Urbanism. In M. Zardini (Ed.), Sense of the City: An Alternative Approach to Urbanism. CCA/Lars Müller Publishers. 

Other readings  

https://www.labsimurb.polimi.it/lpt/

http://www.labsimurb.polimi.it/research/ar4cup-2020-h2020/ 

http://www.labsimurb.polimi.it/ar4cup/